🔗 Share this article

The Republic of South Africa's supreme judicial authority has unanimously ruled that both mothers and fathers of new-borns are granted identical parental leave - a historic ruling hailed as a significant win for gender equality and parental rights.

Present Regulatory Inequality

Under the current law, mothers are granted four months of absence, while fathers receive just 10 days.

Through its decision, the Constitutional Court declared sections of the legislation unconstitutional, calling it biased against dads, and decided that mothers and fathers may now distribute the provided absence as they see fit.

"This constitutes a revolutionary move for equality, parental health, and the prospects of paternal care in the country," commented Sthembiso Phakathi, founder of Single Dads Network.

Judicial Background

Previously, a trial court ruled certain sections of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and the insurance law inequitable and decided that they violated the rights of different household types.

The provincial court then determined that the regulation showed bias toward kinds of parents distinctly regarding the duration of parental leave and insurance payments obtained.

Judicial Proceedings

The case was filed by a partners, the equality organization and other petitioners, who aimed to correct the disproportionate load predominantly impacting birth mothers, emphasizing that parenting responsibilities should be distributed.

The claimants argued that the present regulations treated unequally against parents who were different from the delivering parent - particularly, fathers, guardians, and caregivers of babies born to substitute mothers - by allowing them only 10 days of parental leave, while the biological mother got four months.

Court Reasoning

Revealing the judgment on recently, Justice Zukisa Tshiqi said that all caregivers should be entitled to share the available days as they deemed appropriate, labeling the current law archaic and one which "disproportionately loaded mothers and excluded fathers".

"The protection of birth mothers to the omission of additional caregivers has the detrimental effect of sustaining the assumption that women are, and should be, the main guardians of infants.

"The male parent is marginalised and denied the opportunity to involve himself as a guardian in the nurturing of the newborn during the initial period of growth," she added.

Justice Tshiqi stated the ruling was not just about fair treatment but also about preserving the dignity of families, emphasising that the ultimate focus of the court's decision was the health of children.

"The discriminatory approach not merely excludes caregivers but also deprives infants of the opportunity to be with their parents during a crucial period of care and acclimatization to their new environment."

Reactions and Consequences

The applicants applauded the judgment, while jurists advised that the determination would have major ramifications for businesses, who will need to adjust their existing absence rules to follow the judgement.

"The core of the lawsuit is that it underscores the necessity to provide identical parenting allowances, understanding that caring for a baby is a collective task," Tsietsi Shuping from the Commission for Gender Equality told journalists.

He commented the existing legislation "did not acknowledge changing cultural attitudes around caregiving".

Workplace legal expert Patrick Deale told official outlets that the judgment was "a positive and expected outcome" for parental rights in the state.

Implementation Schedule

The court has delayed its determination of illegality for a specified period, giving the legislature time to modify the existing legislation to conform to its ruling.

Meanwhile, parents will be entitled to determine how they wish to divide the specified period of leave.

When just one caregiver is working, that parent may use the complete time off allowance.